Good afternoon from the verdant county of Surrey.
The posting of this particular article is, I admit, long overdue. One that I had contemplated posting long before now but somehow, always felt that the timing was not right for the particular moment.
Something has changed within the past few days – a sense of urgency and finality, if you will. After an absence of several weeks, my Sister returned a couple of days ago. She has voiced that the time is now right to disclose this 15th September 2013 conversation of ours and, given we are standing on the very threshold of irreversible changes – I would concur with her.
The conversation took place days after Russia had managed to broker a peace deal over accelerating military events in Syria and also shortly after the anniversary of the tragic events that horrifyingly unfurled across millions of television screens across the World only 12 years before.
I chose to ask my Sister about the subject because I was becoming frustrated with the conflicting chaos of different opinions on this emotive event – from the mainstream ‘terrorists flew into buildings’ presentation to those who propose that 9-11 was a promulgation of holograms and mini-nukes. If anyone can stick to a direct course, unwavering from the track of the subject matter concerned, my Sister can.
I shall present the conversation as it occurred at the time and have only removed certain sections which, whilst tenuously connected, were not directly linked to the horrifying event on the day. Her responses could be deemed as unsurprising to some. One particular element was a surprising revelation – and I do not believe that anyone else in either the AltMedia or Mainstream Media communities has ever tackled the subject before.
Given the considerable length of the article (nearly 8600 words), I shall be posting up three sections over the course of the next three days. Today’s section will cover the ‘Whos’, ‘the Whys’, and 7/7.
Conversation with my Sister, 15th September 2013: 911 – Excerpt One
Q: When did they start planning 9-11? 1990s? 80s?
A: 80s. Late 80s is when they started planning the event.
Q: Who is ‘They’? Military? Who was the main planner?
A: Not military. Dick Cheney. GHW Bush. Rumsfeld wasn’t involved, but was aware of the plans. The main masterminds behind the plan were Cheney and Pappy Bush.
Neither of these names surprises me – and I doubt would surprise anyone in the AltMedia community either. For those who believe that 9-11 was a meticulously planned False Flag event (which my Sister has stated was very much the case), Cheney’s link to being involved as a possible planner/orchestrator of 9-11 has long been circulating around the AltMedia community. Cheney, along with several prominent key-players in Bush Junior’s Administration, was a noted member of ‘The Project for the New American Century‘ (acronym, PNAC).
Formed in 1997 by prominent political commentators William Kristol and Robert Kagan, PNAC (a neo-conservative, non-profit think tank of prominent politicians and academics) was overtly supporting the need to establish control via ‘total global military domination’. Their purpose, ostensibly, was to focus on America’s need to:
1. Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
2. Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
3. Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
4. Control the “International Commons” of cyberspace;
5. Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from 3 percent.
Notably, however, the document also suggested that a possible galvanising force towards achieving those aims would be by means of an attack on par with the Pearl Harbour attacks. To quote from respected journalist John Pilger’s December 2002 article ‘A New Pearl Harbour‘:
“The threat posed by US terrorism to the security of nations and individuals was outlined in prophetic detail in a document written more than two years ago and disclosed only recently. What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”. The attacks of 11 September 2001 provided the “new Pearl Harbor”, described as “the opportunity of ages”. The extremists who have since exploited 11 September come from the era of Ronald Reagan, when far-right groups and “think-tanks” were established to avenge the American “defeat” in Vietnam. In the 1990s, there was an added agenda: to justify the denial of a “peace dividend” following the cold war. The Project for the New American Century was formed, along with the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson Institute and others that have since merged the ambitions of the Reagan administration with those of the current Bush regime.”
How does this relate to my Sister’s comment, you may ask, given that she said the plans for the attack on the World Trade Centre began in earnest during the late 1980s? My train of thought is that, whilst PNAC may have been established in 1997, the formulation of the ideas which eventually emerged in the final document may have been floating around the murky political ether for far longer than first thought. Certainly, political names in the PNAC mix have links that reach as far back as Nixon (Donald Rumsfeld is the name that leaps immediately to mind here) and more than a few certainly had involvement in the Reagan Administration to some capacity during the 1980s. And the details provided in John Pilger’s informative article indicates that similar ‘think-tanks’ were, indeed, in existence during the Reagan Years (1981-1989). Curios to note: Who was Reagan’s Vice President for the entire duration of his presidency? None other than George Herbert Walker Bush, the successor to Reagan’s throne at the White House. A man who was the Commander-in-Chief at the commencement of the First Gulf War back in late 1990. Shall we check to see where Dick Cheney was during that time? Well… Cheney was the Republican Whip in Congress in 1989 and became GHWB’s Secretary of Defence upon GHWB’s election to the Presidency that same year.
One thing I will state at this time is that I do not necessarily concur with my Sister’s assertions that Cheney and Bush Senior were the two masterminds of the plan. A plan of this magnitude requires many hands on the tiller – a collective think-tank, as it were. A group, formed towards the end of the Reagan years, with their eyes on the future… a group similar to PNAC…?
However, with my Sister’s assertion that the planning began during the late 1980s, it is not unreasonable to assume that the initial blueprints for the WTC’s ultimate fate were drawn up during the latter stages of Reagan’s administration. Some tweaks needed to be made. After all, this wasn’t the first time The World Trade Centre was a focus of a ‘terrorist’ attack. Remember 1993 anyone?
For anyone harbouring any doubt that an American government would perpetrate such an attack upon its own people in order to achieve nefarious aims, I suggest checking out ‘Operation Northwoods‘. A document rejected by then President John F. Kennedy because he felt an attack on Americans upon American soil, perpetrated by its own government, was morally reprehensible.
Conversation with my Sister, 15th September 2013: 911 – Excerpt Two
Q: Was there a connection between 9-11 and anything else? Was it a joint US/Israeli op? Was 7/7 part of the plot?
A: There are connections although there isn’t a direct one with the London attacks (7/7). 7/7 was a ‘booster shot’ to keep the fear pumping in people – an attempt to persuade (us) that (we) needed more security, erode (our) rights even further..
7-7, of course, refers to the Backpack Bombings which occurred on the London Underground and also in Tavistock Square, Central London during rush hour on Thursday 7th July 2005. Fascinating in the most macabre definition of the word, the attacks happened to coincide with a meticulously planned realistic drill overseen by Visor Consultants, security consultants on contract to the London Metropolitan Police. Only months before, during April 2005, London played host to a similar drill, codenamed Atlantic Blue.
Incidentally, there were other notable simulation drills arranged during that 5 year period. They were:
1. CIA Sponsored Exercise on the Morning of 9/11;
2. October 2000 Mock Terror Attack on the Pentagon.
Oh, something else to mention… October 2000’s Mock Terror Attack on the Pentagon entailed a simulation of a passenger jet crashing into the building. However, in the context of later comments by my Sister, one envisages this ‘simulation’ serves a purpose – throws investigators off the scent, smoke and mirrors every step of the way – no missiles, move along and nothing to see here.
We return to London. The following quote from Global Research’s August 2005 article is also of immense interest:
“According to a report of the Associated Press correspondent in Jerusalem, the Israeli embassy in London had been advised in advance by Scotland Yard of an impending bomb attack:
Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.(AP, 7 July 2005)
Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was warned by his embassy not to attend an attend an economic conference organized by the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) in collaboration with the Israeli embassy and Deutsche Bank. Netanyahu was staying at the Aldridge Hotel in Mayfair. The conference venue was a few miles away at the Great Eastern Hotel close to the Liverpool subway station, where one of the bomb blasts occurred.”
I’d recommend reading the article, for it throws a spotlight on three notable figures – Rudolph Giuliani, who you may remember was the Mayor of New York in 2001 and who happened also to be in London on 7/7; Benjamin Netanyahu, now Prime Minister of Israel who, as mentioned above, was also in London that day; and Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants who.. oh yes, were overseeing the ‘drill’ on 7/7. Throw in the call from Scotland Yard to the Israeli Embassy warning of them of the blast in advance (Power was a former Scotland Yard official prior to opening his independent security firm)…
And yes, it is very safe to say that the United Kingdom has seen an increase in draconian and snooping laws since the attacks. CCTV cameras scowling down from every corner or building, amendments of Terrorism Acts hastily occurring within a year of the bombings. Rights to privacy have certainly eroded in the name of security and barely anyone has batted an eyelid. Any links to 9-11? I have to say that I share my Sister’s viewpoint – that the two events are not directly linked – and that there happens to be the same old names floating around that old murky political ether once more…
TOMORROW: Tomorrow’s second instalment will look at the events of the day in greater depth.
(Disclaimer: My hypotheses, theories and speculations are NOT related or connected in any way, shape or form to any of the material provided as links on this blog. I have provided my own hypotheses, theories and speculations along the way. Purely my own speculations based upon everything I have watched, read and heard from sources terrestrial and beyond our World.)