Tag Archives: World Trade Centre

Messages From My Sister (Part Three, Final Section): 9/11 – A September Conversation


Good afternoon from the verdant county of Surrey.

I am hopeful that you have all enjoyed a peaceful Festive weekend and are looking forward to the upcoming celebrations as we welcome the advent of what is likely to become a pivotal year in history – 2016.

I also wish to apologise for the late posting of this final section of ‘Messages From My Sister’: 9/11 – A September Conversation’. I had promised a Boxing Day posting but, once more, familial matters were pressing. It was also a welcome opportunity to recharge the batteries.

December 22nd’s posting covered the events that unfolded that fateful day in 2001. I had also described this final entry as ‘(offering) comments and speculation based on my Sister’s final remarks during our September 2013 conversation. Tacit foreknowledge, secrets to be kept, things to be swept under the carpet – and the methods employed to achieve those nefarious aims?‘ This final section has been the hardest to write, purely because of the chilling revelations that unfolded during that September conversation. Once you have read the article, you will understand my discomfiture in disclosing the comments. However, I shall post them, nonetheless.


Conversation with my Sister, 15th September 2013: 911 – Excerpt Five

Q: Were the Media aware of the World Trade Centre impacts prior to the event? Was WTC7 pulled because the evidence of the Enron scandal was located there? What about the Duchess of York – she had an Office in the World Trade Centre towers. Was it believed that she would be there? Was there a plan to assassinate her?
A: Yes – the higher echelons of the Media Corporations knew the truth, including the BBC. Rupert Murdoch certainly knew – think of a ‘Tomorrow Never Dies’ scenario. WTC7 was pulled because of the Enron evidence. The Duchess of York – very perceptive. She was supposed to be at work in her Office in one of the Towers that day (located on one of the levels affected the worst). She was supposed to be there… It is only by her good fortune (and it wasn’t her time) that she was running late that day. Plan failed. Loose Cannon No. 2 survived.

During the interview with Rebekah Roth, Bill Ryan had described the events of 9-11 as ‘multi-layered and multi-dimensional‘ (paraphrased). I would concur that this is a painfully accurate description of the horrors that began to unfold on 11th September 2001. As has now become apparent, the destruction of the World Trade Centre buildings must have been planned over a period of at least 20-25 years. It was a multi-purpose operation. Again, one need only refer to ‘The Project for the New American Century‘ for a blueprint of the ‘opportunities‘ that could be afforded to a power and resource hungry cabal by such an event.

According to my Sister, this carefully-planned event would also serve as adequate cover for sorting out ‘little issues‘ which the Establishment considered embarrassing or potentially destructive. Whilst certainly not in the original blueprints drawn up back in the 1980s, 9/11 was certainly going to provide that perfect cover. Basically, several birds were going to be killed with the one devastating stone.

Yes – the higher echelons of the Media Corporations knew the truth, including the BBC. Rupert Murdoch certainly knew – think of a ‘Tomorrow Never Dies’ scenario: It is undeniable that Fox News, CNN, the BBC and pretty much every major news network was papered with wall-to-wall coverage for weeks following the attacks. And yes, one can imagine that various senior executives and the heads of those media conglomerates may not have been terribly upset at the mass exposure that this ‘opportunity’ afforded their networks.

Again, one could voice that my Sister’s assertion is merely conjecture.

However, it is at this point of ‘conjecture’ that we return to the Curious Case of WTC7. At 5pm EST, the BBC’s Jane Standley, standing by a window in a property close to the site of the attacks, addresses the questions posed by, I believe it is Philip Hayton, the BBC’s studio news anchor, about the collapse of World Trade Centre 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers building. As Ms. Standley delivers her latest report on the situation, it is evident that WTC7 is still standing in the background shot behind her. In short, the building collapse is announced 20-25 minutes before it actually occurred. This You Tube video seems to capture that very moment:

It seems timely to insert a sentence from the next (and final) excerpt here:

And it would have been perfect, except for one error – the collapse of WTC7, announced 25 minutes early.

With the benefit of retrospective hindsight and the strong detective work undertaken by many people who are determined to uncover the truth of that day, many anomalies have come to light (one example being the discovery of mint-condition passports found amidst the smouldering remains of the once proud Twin Towers). Whilst it is difficult to verify whether my Sister’s comment is accurate or not, one feels that the strongest evidence of corporative foreknowledge arguably has to be the BBC’s announcement of the collapse of WTC7. Another thought that has crossed my mind is how unusual it was that multi-network cameras seemed to be very conveniently located at all the right places on the day of the attack… or, should I say, all the right places that they NEEDED to be located at, perfect positions to capture every single horrible moment. All primed perfectly towards the stricken towers.

With regard to the BBC coverage… did someone veer off the script purposely, was it a complete accident or did something else happen…?

You may be wondering why my Sister has referenced the 1997 instalment of the James Bond franchise, ‘Tomorrow Never Dies‘. Indeed, the film was released just over a year after her passing. Naturally curious, I asked her how she knew about the film. She drily informed me with more than a tad of incredulity that “(she) keeps herself fully appraised of everything that (she) needs to keep track on.

Starring Pierce Brosnan as the enigmatic British secret agent, Bond finds himself pitted against a media mogul by the name of Elliot Carver, who is determined to be the first person to break the news about hostilities between China and the West. In short, he wishes to trigger the event that would herald the start of World War III:

The media baron Elliot Carver, head of the Carver Media Group Network (CMGN), soon begins his plans to use the encoder to provoke war between China and the United Kingdom, hoping to replace the current Chinese government with one more supportive to Carver’s plans of exclusive broadcast rights in their country. Meaconing the GPS signal using the encoder, Gupta sends the British frigate HMS Devonshire off-course into Chinese-held waters in the South China Sea, where Carver’s stealth ship, commanded by Mr. Stamper, sinks the frigate with a sea drill and steals one of its missiles, while shooting down a Chinese J-7 fighter jet sent to investigate the British presence, and killing off the Devonshire’s survivors with Chinese weaponry. After reading a CMGN report of the incident as a Chinese attack, the Minister of Defence orders Roebuck to deploy the British Fleet to recover the frigate, and possibly retaliate, while leaving M only 48 hours to investigate its sinking.

M sends Bond to investigate Carver, due to Carver Media releasing their news articles with critical details hours before the events had become known, along with MI6 noticing a spurious signal from one of his CMGN communications satellites when the frigate was sunk.

(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomorrow_Never_Dies )

Talking of which… does anyone know what’s happening in the South China Seas today…?


WTC7 was pulled because of the Enron evidence: Rebekah Roth references the Enron Scandal during both The Liberty Brothers and Bill Ryan interviews. Many Alternative Media newscasters, websites, podcasts and Stations have discussed the vast swathes of evidence that disappeared forever following the collapse of (or, should we say, demolition of) WTC7. The financial shenanigans of this particular American power giant – and the evidence that was required for a major court case in the following months – was stored in WTC7.

For those who need a reminder of what the Enron Scandal was about, this provides a succinct summary of the events leading up to the court case:

The Enron scandal was a financial scandal that was revealed in late 2001. After a series of revelations involving irregular accounting procedures bordering on fraud, perpetrated throughout the 1990s, involving Enron and its accounting firm Arthur Andersen, it stood at the verge of undergoing the largest bankruptcy in history by mid-November 2001. A white knight rescue attempt by a similar, smaller energy company, Dynegy, was not viable. Enron filed for bankruptcy on December 2, 2001.

As the scandal was revealed, Enron shares dropped from over US$90.00 to just pennies. As Enron had been considered a blue chip stock, this was an unprecedented and disastrous event in the financial world. Enron’s plunge occurred after it was revealed that much of its profits and revenue were the result of deals with special purpose entities (limited partnerships which it controlled). The result was that many of Enron’s debts and the losses that it suffered were not reported in its financial statements.

In addition, the scandal caused the dissolution of Arthur Andersen, which at the time was one of the world’s top five accounting firms.

(Source: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080123183238AAhZPpE )

As has been revealed by many sources over the years, Enron did not fully escape unscathed, with one of its executives imprisoned for the remainder of his life for his financial crimes. Many other secrets, however, disappeared beneath the storm of fiery rubble that day.


The Duchess of York – very perceptive. She was supposed to be at work in her Office in one of the Towers that day (located on one of the levels affected the worst). She was supposed to be there. It is only by her good fortune (and it wasn’t her time) that she was running late that day. Plan failed. Loose Cannon No. 2 survived: I shall say that I do not believe I have seen this speculated on the Internet – or indeed, anywhere else. And I wish I had no cause to commence this speculation. This comment, along with the speculated fate of the passengers and crew from the 4 ‘planes used in the attacks, chills me to the core. Especially when one learns that the Duchess WAS supposed to be attending a meeting in the offices of her charity, ‘Chances for Children‘, at 8.45am EST on Friday 11th September 2001.

ABC News reported the following:

The former Sarah Ferguson, ex-wife of Britain’s Prince Andrew, had an 8:45 a.m. meeting scheduled that day for her Chances for Children charity, which was based at the World Trade Center, but was running late, reports columnist Cindy Adams.
Her staffers were gathered downstairs in the lobby to greet the duchess and escort her upstairs. Just seconds after the first plane hit, Sarah’s car arrived at the door. After whisking her employees into her limo, she sped off to safety, Adams reports.
The charity’s offices were on the 101st floor, according to wire service reports, although it’s not clear which tower they were located in.

(Source: http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=102496&page=1 )

Interestingly, the same article reports that her ex-husband was en route to Atlanta in the US and was already halfway across the Atlantic at the time of the attacks. The ‘plane returned to the UK.

One anticipates that there will be those who feel that my Sister’s comments could be considered conjecture, even controversial in nature. One also anticipates hearing the question, ‘why would anyone seek to assassinate the Duchess?‘ One need look no further than my Sister’s own comment – ‘Loose Cannon No. 2‘.

To remind yourself of the origins of the ‘loose cannon‘ comment, cast your minds back to early 1997. The late Princess Diana had begun her campaign to bring the plight of landmine victims to light, facing the considerable ire of the ruling Conservative politicians of the time. The ‘loose cannon’ comment was coined in reference to the late Princess by former Conservative junior defence minster, Earl Howe. As you also remember, the Princess died in Paris only months after her anti-landmine work began.

To relate this comment to the Duchess of York, one has to remember that, akin with her former sister-in-law, the Duchess was certainly no stranger to controversy. Scandals had beset the Duchess prior to her divorce from the Duke of York, which was finalised at around the same time as the Prince and Princess of Wales’ divorce. The Duchess later became estranged from Princess Diana due to comments made about Diana in her 1990s autobiography.

Irrespective of this estrangement and their differences of opinion, one thing that the Duchess had in common with her erstwhile sister-in-law was possession of a resolutely fearless streak. No matter one’s opinion on royalty, one cannot dispute that the Duchess – the ‘commoner’ who married into the Family – was not averse to ruffling the Establishment’s starched feathers; a quality she maintains, for better or worse, to this day. She certainly appeared to provide more than adequate reasons for the Establishment to formulate some motive to send her into some sort of exile, whether it be one of retirement or permanent removal altogether. Remember, the image of the Royal Family was still in recovery mode from the fallout of their apparent indifference to the death of the Princess of Wales. Also, I recollect press reports of the time strongly suggesting that the Duke of Edinburgh considered both of his former daughters-in-law as ’embarrassments’ to the family.

Once more, I repeat, that this is mere speculation on my part, based on my Sister’s comments. There is no proof that this was the case at all. However, it does seem immensely strange that, had she arrived on time, the Duchess would have been present in one of the buildings at almost the exact time the first ‘plane struck the North Tower, which was 8.46am EST…


Conversation with my Sister, 15th September 2013: 911 – Final Excerpt

Q: Was there any CGI trickery used in footage of the attacks? Holograms used? The early announcement of the collapse of WTC7? How were the Towers brought down?

A: No, there wasn’t any CGI trickery used, no holograms.. none of that. THOSE PLANES HIT THE TOWERS… IT HAPPENED. No mini-nukes were involved. Pure and simple detonation – thermite. Nano-thermite explosives. Lot of work had been done on the buildings prior to the attacks and that’s when the explosives were planted. And it would have been perfect, except for one error – the collapse of WTC7, announced 25 minutes early. Their greatest plan – the one that they had been planning for so long – became their greatest mistake. The spiritual war began then…

During the interviews mentioned in the previous posting, Rebekah Roth details the unusual linking of a Hollywood production company to one of the purported victims/passengers of one of the flights, the previously mentioned Barbara Olsen, a former member of staff of the Stacy Keach Productions company. She has also found links to a company who specialises in televisual and film CGI effects.

I am aware of many of the Alternative Media speculations that declare that the entire scene was an elaborate hoax – nothing hit the buildings, everything seen by the horrified witnesses was all holograms with some fancy nuclear-fuelled pyrotechnics thrown in. I am about to face the wrath of some of the community with what I am about to say. In my humblest of opinions, those who even have the temerity to suggest that the residents, commuters and workers who found themselves standing amidst the Armageddon on Earth that rained down around them that awful September morning were fabricating everything are denigrating, defamatory and insensitive.

As my Sister mentions – and anyone with a pair of eyes to see and ears to hear could register – PLANES HIT THE TOWERS THAT MORNING. They were NOT holograms. Whilst I am certainly not ruling out the use of CGI trickery on resulting news footage and certainly question the apparent smoothness of the second ‘plane’s collision with the South Tower on said footage, eye-witness accounts and independent footage verifies that ‘planes hit the buildings. Something else to note is the fact that I, along with millions of other viewers, was not a personal eye-witness. I, along with millions of other viewers, was not in Manhattan that day. When one hears coverage on personal You Tube video footage from people crying in horror that ‘it was a military jet‘ ploughing into a building full of innocent people, one has no reason to doubt their words whatsoever.

Whilst You Tube has its detractors – and there certainly are some amazingly fantastical videos available for those who are interested – there are videos of high quality, authentic footage to be found. One particularly telling video shows a close-up of a descending sequence of exploding flashes prior to the collapse of the Towers. As far as I am aware, the footage has been examined and no one has any reason to doubt its veracity. Compare videos of the Towers collapsing with those of controlled demolitions and attempt to describe the difference.

For those who maintain that only ‘mini-nukes’ could have caused health problems, it is worth perusing Time Magazine‘s Sam Frizell’s 2014 article, in which he notes:

The massive dust cloud that enveloped Lower Manhattan after the collapse of the Twin Towers was a highly toxic environmental hazard that consisted of asbestos, cement, gypsum, glass fibers, lead and other metals and was highly alkaline. Past research has shown it caused asthma and cancer in many first responders and local residents.

(Source: http://www.911truth.org/911-dust-cloud-likely-caused-widespread-pregnancy-complications/ )

Frizell also disturbingly reports an increase in pregnancy complications since the attacks, with more incidences of premature births and low birthweights.

Asbestos has long been known for its detrimental effects on construction workers – with asbestos panelling used regularly in construction works before awareness of the health ramifications became fully known – and the World Trade Centre was riddled with the stuff. Glass fibres, whilst seeming innocuous enough, can shred and scar lung linings if inhaled. Lead is a well-known carcinogen. All of those combined equals a very nasty carcinogenic and irritating concoction indeed.

It has been frequently reported that many survivors and residents have fallen ill with cancers or aggravated lung conditions. An August 2015 NYPost article details the many health problems which have dogged the survivors – and that 3700 survivors have been diagnosed with cancers since the attacks. Here And Now reports the litany of health problems that have affected survivors include: asthma, sinusitis, cancers (ranging from the most common, thyroid, to lymphomas), continued rehabilitations from life-changing injuries, etc.

I would also speculate that the most under-reported injury of all is that of mental scarring – PTSD, Survivor’s Guilt, the nightmares that never fade with the years.

Lot of work had been done on the buildings prior to the attacks and that’s when the explosives were planted: Search ‘Building Works on WTC before 9-11‘ on any browser search engine and one will find oneself burrowing even deeper into the 9-11 rabbit hole. Where to begin? Well, how about the investigative work undertaken by 911Blogger.com‘s Aiden Monaghan which uncovered unspecified building works undertaken by Turner Construction prior to the attacks? Of interesting note is the following snippet from Monaghan’s detailed article:

In 1997 Turner Construction also constructed the new headquarters for the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). The Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center, a laboratory managed by NAVSEA was described during the 1990s as the “National Center for Energetics”, the “Pentagon’s jargon to broadly describe explosive materials, propellants and pyrotechnics” and as the “only reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States”.


(Source: http://911blogger.com/node/19889 )

This is a very good article – and recommended reading. I would also recommend paying close attention to the comments on the blog posting.

A blogger by the name of Serendipity has provided links to reports which details the following information:

Initially the explosives theory suffered from the problem that the mainstream media did not report that anyone heard explosions just prior to the WTC collapse. But in the last year reports have surfaced, and there is now even video evidence available to anyone which shows that explosions actually did occur within the Twin Towers prior to their collapse.

Television viewers watching the horrific events of Sept. 11 saw evidence of explosions before the towers collapsed. Televised images show what appears to be a huge explosion occurring near ground level, in the vicinity of the 47-story Salomon Brothers Building, known as WTC 7, prior to the collapse of the first tower.

…  One eyewitness whose office is near the World Trade Center told AFP that he was standing among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two-and-a-half blocks from the South tower, when he saw “a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15.” He saw about six of these brief flashes, accompanied by “a crackling sound” before the tower collapsed. Each tower had six central support columns.

One of the first firefighters in the stricken second tower, Louie Cacchioli, 51, told People Weekly on Sept. 24: “I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building.”

Kim White, 32, an employee on the 80th floor, also reported hearing an explosion. “All of a sudden the building shook, then it started to sway. We didn’t know what was going on,” she told People. “We got all our people on the floor into the stairwell … at that time we all thought it was a fire … We got down as far as the 74th floor … then there was another explosion.”  — Eyewitness Reports Persist Of Bombs At WTC Collapse

(Source: http://www.serendipity.li/wtc5.htm )

And there are more articles to be found. Far more.

... time for justice to prevail ...

… time for justice to prevail …


Once more, I will conclude this blog by stating that my own hypotheses, theories and speculations are NOT related in any way, shape or form to any of the material provided as evidence on this blog. I have provided my own hypotheses, theories and speculations along the way. Purely my own speculations based upon everything I have watched, read and heard from sources terrestrial and beyond our World.

At this point in time, I feel I am reaching the end of this particular peculiar journey of mine. I do have this to say…

… the time has arrived for the truth to prevail.

A horrendous betrayal has been perpetrated on the American people by those in authority who claim to have had their best interests at heart. In fact, the betrayal stretches far beyond the reaches of American shores. Ask anyone in Afghanistan. Ask anyone in Iraq, or Syria. Ask anyone who has lost a loved one in a war that started as an idea in the heads of self-serving academics and politicians.

And yes, I’m not afraid to say that the names listed in the sorry selfish bible that is ‘The Project for the New American Century’ should be the very first to be tried by a free American people for treason. And tried by an international court for crimes against humanity.

In my view, these so-called bastions of authority view humanity as nothing more than mere chattel, the collateral damage that stands in the way of their unscrupulous ambitions. These suited charlatans are self-serving opportunists who wouldn’t even blink at the screams of someone crying in agony as a result of the nefarious deeds that they plot. These so-called bastions then find themselves convenient patsies as adequate ‘excuse cover’ so that they can retain the saintly auras that only they believe they possess.

My anger, as mentioned earlier, is too palpable to adequately express with words. I choke as I think of the thousands of people who died that day… of the thousands who continue to die in wars declared on countries because of the events of that day, wars planned well in advance by vengeful and greedy think-tanks. My stomach twists and turns as I think about the terrified passengers and crew as their planes touched down on airbases, feel myself in their shoes as they face their fates. My heart goes out to the families left without fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles, grandparents and grandchildren as a result of the disgusting decades-long scheming that those suit-clad nightmares had so coldly debated.

Furthermore.. like many before me.. I am burning with a desire to find justice for the innocents who were caught in the nightmarish, greedy dystopian schemes of these politicians and academics who possess everything but empathy and humanity. I sincerely hope that there won’t be too many more people thirsting for justice after me. Why do I say that? Because I am hopeful that we are turning a corner. I am hopeful that we are about to shed a very bright light upon the perpetrators of this horrible crime against beautiful human souls who wanted – and continue to want – nothing more than to lead a life with those that they loved.

I am hopeful that we can finally face the spirits of those who lost their lives that day – and also of those who have lost their lives in the name of one of the worst crimes against humanity – and say, justice has prevailed.

And I am hopeful that that time is now.

Messages From My Sister (Part Three, First Section): 9/11 – A September Conversation

800px-WTC_smoking_on_9-11 Michael Foran

Good afternoon from the verdant county of Surrey.

The posting of this particular article is, I admit, long overdue. One that I had contemplated posting long before now but somehow, always felt that the timing was not right for the particular moment.

Something has changed within the past few days – a sense of urgency and finality, if you will. After an absence of several weeks, my Sister returned a couple of days ago. She has voiced that the time is now right to disclose this 15th September 2013 conversation of ours and, given we are standing on the very threshold of irreversible changes – I would concur with her.

The conversation took place days after Russia had managed to broker a peace deal over accelerating military events in Syria and also shortly after the anniversary of the tragic events that horrifyingly unfurled across millions of television screens across the World only 12 years before.

I chose to ask my Sister about the subject because I was becoming frustrated with the conflicting chaos of different opinions on this emotive event – from the mainstream ‘terrorists flew into buildings’ presentation to those who propose that 9-11 was a promulgation of holograms and mini-nukes. If anyone can stick to a direct course, unwavering from the track of the subject matter concerned, my Sister can.

I shall present the conversation as it occurred at the time and have only removed certain sections which, whilst tenuously connected, were not directly linked to the horrifying event on the day. Her responses could be deemed as unsurprising to some. One particular element was a surprising revelation – and I do not believe that anyone else in either the AltMedia or Mainstream Media communities has ever tackled the subject before.

Given the considerable length of the article (nearly 8600 words), I shall be posting up three sections over the course of the next three days. Today’s section will cover the ‘Whos’, ‘the Whys’, and 7/7.

A Blueprint...?

A Blueprint…?

Conversation with my Sister, 15th September 2013: 911 – Excerpt One

Q: When did they start planning 9-11? 1990s? 80s?
A: 80s. Late 80s is when they started planning the event.

Q: Who is ‘They’? Military? Who was the main planner?
A: Not military. Dick Cheney. GHW Bush. Rumsfeld wasn’t involved, but was aware of the plans. The main masterminds behind the plan were Cheney and Pappy Bush.

Neither of these names surprises me – and I doubt would surprise anyone in the AltMedia community either. For those who believe that 9-11 was a meticulously planned False Flag event (which my Sister has stated was very much the case), Cheney’s link to being involved as a possible planner/orchestrator of 9-11 has long been circulating around the AltMedia community. Cheney, along with several prominent key-players in Bush Junior’s Administration, was a noted member of ‘The Project for the New American Century‘ (acronym, PNAC).

Formed in 1997 by prominent political commentators William Kristol and Robert Kagan, PNAC (a neo-conservative, non-profit think tank of prominent politicians and academics) was overtly supporting the need to establish control via ‘total global military domination’. Their purpose, ostensibly, was to focus on America’s need to:

1. Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
2. Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
3. Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
4. Control the “International Commons” of cyberspace;
5. Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from 3 percent.

(Source: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century)

Notably, however, the document also suggested that a possible galvanising force towards achieving those aims would be by means of an attack on par with the Pearl Harbour attacks. To quote from respected journalist John Pilger’s December 2002 article ‘A New Pearl Harbour‘:

The threat posed by US terrorism to the security of nations and individuals was outlined in prophetic detail in a document written more than two years ago and disclosed only recently. What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”. The attacks of 11 September 2001 provided the “new Pearl Harbor”, described as “the opportunity of ages”. The extremists who have since exploited 11 September come from the era of Ronald Reagan, when far-right groups and “think-tanks” were established to avenge the American “defeat” in Vietnam. In the 1990s, there was an added agenda: to justify the denial of a “peace dividend” following the cold war. The Project for the New American Century was formed, along with the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson Institute and others that have since merged the ambitions of the Reagan administration with those of the current Bush regime.

(Source: http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/nc-pilger.html)

How does this relate to my Sister’s comment, you may ask, given that she said the plans for the attack on the World Trade Centre began in earnest during the late 1980s? My train of thought is that, whilst PNAC may have been established in 1997, the formulation of the ideas which eventually emerged in the final document may have been floating around the murky political ether for far longer than first thought. Certainly, political names in the PNAC mix have links that reach as far back as Nixon (Donald Rumsfeld is the name that leaps immediately to mind here) and more than a few certainly had involvement in the Reagan Administration to some capacity during the 1980s. And the details provided in John Pilger’s informative article indicates that similar ‘think-tanks’ were, indeed, in existence during the Reagan Years (1981-1989). Curios to note: Who was Reagan’s Vice President for the entire duration of his presidency? None other than George Herbert Walker Bush, the successor to Reagan’s throne at the White House. A man who was the Commander-in-Chief at the commencement of the First Gulf War back in late 1990. Shall we check to see where Dick Cheney was during that time? Well… Cheney was the Republican Whip in Congress in 1989 and became GHWB’s Secretary of Defence upon GHWB’s election to the Presidency that same year.

One thing I will state at this time is that I do not necessarily concur with my Sister’s assertions that Cheney and Bush Senior were the two masterminds of the plan. A plan of this magnitude requires many hands on the tiller – a collective think-tank, as it were. A group, formed towards the end of the Reagan years, with their eyes on the future… a group similar to PNAC…?

However, with my Sister’s assertion that the planning began during the late 1980s, it is not unreasonable to assume that the initial blueprints for the WTC’s ultimate fate were drawn up during the latter stages of Reagan’s administration. Some tweaks needed to be made. After all, this wasn’t the first time The World Trade Centre was a focus of a ‘terrorist’ attack. Remember 1993 anyone?

For anyone harbouring any doubt that an American government would perpetrate such an attack upon its own people in order to achieve nefarious aims, I suggest checking out ‘Operation Northwoods‘. A document rejected by then President John F. Kennedy because he felt an attack on Americans upon American soil, perpetrated by its own government, was morally reprehensible.

Aftermath of the 7/7 London bombings

Aftermath of the 7/7 London bombings

Conversation with my Sister, 15th September 2013: 911 – Excerpt Two

Q: Was there a connection between 9-11 and anything else? Was it a joint US/Israeli op? Was 7/7 part of the plot?
A: There are connections although there isn’t a direct one with the London attacks (7/7). 7/7 was a ‘booster shot’ to keep the fear pumping in people – an attempt to persuade (us) that (we) needed more security, erode (our) rights even further..

7-7, of course, refers to the Backpack Bombings which occurred on the London Underground and also in Tavistock Square, Central London during rush hour on Thursday 7th July 2005. Fascinating in the most macabre definition of the word, the attacks happened to coincide with a meticulously planned realistic drill overseen by Visor Consultants, security consultants on contract to the London Metropolitan Police. Only months before, during April 2005, London played host to a similar drill, codenamed Atlantic Blue.

Incidentally, there were other notable simulation drills arranged during that 5 year period. They were:

1. CIA Sponsored Exercise on the Morning of 9/11;
2. October 2000 Mock Terror Attack on the Pentagon.

Oh, something else to mention… October 2000’s Mock Terror Attack on the Pentagon entailed a simulation of a passenger jet crashing into the building. However, in the context of later comments by my Sister, one envisages this ‘simulation’ serves a purpose – throws investigators off the scent, smoke and mirrors every step of the way – no missiles, move along and nothing to see here.

(Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/7-7-mock-terror-drill-what-relationship-to-the-real-time-terror-attacks/821 )

We return to London. The following quote from Global Research’s August 2005 article is also of immense interest:

According to a report of the Associated Press correspondent in Jerusalem, the Israeli embassy in London had been advised in advance by Scotland Yard of an impending bomb attack:
Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.(AP, 7 July 2005)
Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was warned by his embassy not to attend an attend an economic conference organized by the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) in collaboration with the Israeli embassy and Deutsche Bank. Netanyahu was staying at the Aldridge Hotel in Mayfair. The conference venue was a few miles away at the Great Eastern Hotel close to the Liverpool subway station, where one of the bomb blasts occurred.

I’d recommend reading the article, for it throws a spotlight on three notable figures – Rudolph Giuliani, who you may remember was the Mayor of New York in 2001 and who happened also to be in London on 7/7; Benjamin Netanyahu, now Prime Minister of Israel who, as mentioned above, was also in London that day; and Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants who.. oh yes, were overseeing the ‘drill’ on 7/7. Throw in the call from Scotland Yard to the Israeli Embassy warning of them of the blast in advance (Power was a former Scotland Yard official prior to opening his independent security firm)…

… coincidence?

And yes, it is very safe to say that the United Kingdom has seen an increase in draconian and snooping laws since the attacks. CCTV cameras scowling down from every corner or building, amendments of Terrorism Acts hastily occurring within a year of the bombings. Rights to privacy have certainly eroded in the name of security and barely anyone has batted an eyelid. Any links to 9-11? I have to say that I share my Sister’s viewpoint – that the two events are not directly linked – and that there happens to be the same old names floating around that old murky political ether once more…

TOMORROW: Tomorrow’s second instalment will look at the events of the day in greater depth.

(Disclaimer: My hypotheses, theories and speculations are NOT related or connected in any way, shape or form to any of the material provided as links on this blog. I have provided my own hypotheses, theories and speculations along the way. Purely my own speculations based upon everything I have watched, read and heard from sources terrestrial and beyond our World.)

We Will Never Forget…

We Will Never Forget

(Original Image from thecoincidentaldandy.blogspot.com)